![]() ![]() ![]() Upon close inspection of the signs and symbols, you notice the thinner, longer dashes, both with tighter spacing (not an improvement, IMHO!) In addition, it has thinner linear symbols (except for the hyphen, which has been made heavier), redesigned and % symbols, and a heavier asterisk. ![]() In addition, the swash has been removed from the lowercase italic roman ‘z’. Times New Roman has thinner serifs, blunted terminals, and a rounded ear on the ‘g’, as well as other more subtle refinements. While these two fonts look very similar and almost identical at small sizes, you can see the differences at larger sizes. These distinctions remain today-including the fact that Times New Roman is still owned by the typeface company Monotype, while Times is owned by its rival, Linotype. And Roboto is a different typeface from Gotham or Times New Roman. For example, Roboto Thin Italic is a different font from Roboto Black Italic, but both fonts are within the same typeface Roboto. Differences Between Times Roman and Times New Roman Generally, we defined font as a complete character set within a typeface. The better, whiter paper enhanced the new typeface’s high degree of contrast and sharp serifs and created a sparkling, modern look. The typeface was very successful for The Times of London, which used a higher grade of newsprint than most newspapers. However, newspapers of the day (including The Times) also used Linotype equipment, so Linotype developed a version of Times New Roman for their typesetters, which became known as ‘Times Roman.’ The Linotype version, often simply called ‘Times,’ was optimized for line-casting technology, though the differences in the basic design are subtle. Times New Roman was originally developed by Monotype for use on their own typesetting equipment, which produced type in individual characters. As the old type used by the newspaper had informally been referred to as ‘Times Old Roman,’ Morison’s revision became ‘Times New Roman.’ The Times of London debuted the new typeface in October 1932, and after one year they released the design for commercial sale. Morison used an older typeface, Plantin, as the basis for his design, but made revisions for legibility and economy of space (always important concerns for newspapers). Serif typefaces tend to be easier to read at small sizes, in turn making the text more comprehensible. The new design was supervised by Morison, a typographic consultant to The Times (and to Monotype), and drawn by Victor Lardent, an artist from the advertising department of the newspaper. There are many examples of different types and styles of typefaces being used on this one newspaper page, but note that a serif typeface is being used for the main body text. In 1931, The Times of London commissioned a new text type design from Stanley Morison and the Monotype Corporation, after Morison had written an article criticizing The Times for being badly printed and typographically behind the times. The original typeface used by the British newspaper The Times (founded in 1785) wasn’t officially named ‘Times.’ It was referred to as ‘the Times font’ or the typeface used by The Times. A very early front page of The Times (of London) from 1788. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |